Complaints and disputed decisions

A dispute over a bonus is rarely a fight about honesty. It is a fight about records. The operator holds the complete transaction log and its own copy of the rulebook; the player usually holds a recollection. Everything below is designed to close that gap — and almost all of it has to happen before the problem exists, not after.

Build the file before you need it

DocumentWhen to capture itWhat it proves
Dated screenshot of the termsBefore pressing acceptWhich version of the rules applied at the moment of the claim
Claim timestampImmediately after the bonus creditsWhen the wagering clock and the expiry clock started
Bet history exportEnd of the wagering periodThat no round exceeded the maximum bet and no excluded title was played
Payment confirmationAt deposit and at withdrawal requestAmount, method and transaction reference on the payment provider’s side
Support transcriptEvery contactWhat was promised, by whom, and under which case reference

The first row is the one people skip, and it is the one that decides most cases. Promotional rulebooks reserve the right of amendment; without a dated capture, a changed clause is unprovable.

Check the terms currently in the cashier

The five disputes that actually happen

Writing a complaint that gets read

Keep it to a screen. Open with the account reference and the date of the event. State what you expected and what happened, in that order. Quote the clause you are relying on word for word rather than paraphrasing it. Attach the file described above. Close with one specific request — restore the bonus, release the withdrawal, or provide a written reason — and ask explicitly for a case reference. Adjectives cost you credibility; timestamps buy it.

Send it by email from the address registered on the account. Live chat is fine for clarification, but a complaint that exists only inside a chat window is a complaint with no archive.

The escalation ladder

  1. Support. In writing, with a case reference issued.
  2. Formal complaints procedure. The route described in the operator’s own terms of service. The goal is a written final response, not a conversation.
  3. External review. Alternative dispute resolution or a report to the supervisory authority. In Greece the market is supervised by the ΕΕΕΠ, which also maintains the public register of licensed operators.
  4. Payment channel. If the disagreement concerns a card charge rather than a promotional clause, the card issuer is a separate and parallel route.

What a complaint cannot achieve

It cannot reverse the outcome of a round because the result felt unfair, and it cannot recover money lost in ordinary play. It cannot lift a self-exclusion early — that immovability is the entire point of the measure. And it cannot be pursued through this site: crix.info has no access to accounts, balances or security decisions, and any page claiming otherwise is not ours.

Frequently asked questions

What single piece of evidence matters most in a bonus dispute?
A dated capture of the terms page taken before the offer was accepted. It establishes which version of a one-sided document applied to you, and it is the one item that cannot be revised after the fact by anybody else.
How long should the operator get before escalation?
As long as its own terms of service specify for a formal complaint. The internal route has to be exhausted first, and it has to end in a written final answer with a case reference — external bodies routinely return files that never reached that stage.
Can crix.info intervene with the operator on my behalf?
No. This is an editorial site with no access to accounts, balances or security decisions. It can explain what the rulebook says and what the correct order of escalation is, and nothing beyond that.

Read next: The clause-by-clause verdict · Bonus terms in detail · Support channels · Self-exclusion · Terms of use

← Back to offers

See the offer